Capital University Music Technology Department hosts Larry Groupé, Hollywood film composer
Adult and Graduate Open House 2014
Capital University To Present an Evening with Dennis Lehane
OMEA Honors Capital University's Jim Swearingen for Distinguished Service
23rd annual Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day of Learning January 20
Nursing Students Take Top Honors at Statewide Competition
see more news & events
Grief comes to us from all angles of love and hate. We cannot allow ourselves to believe that just because something is harming us we will not have grief when it is gone. Losing any piece of ourselves can lead to grief that we need to recognize as legitimate and strive to understand. Unfortunately, the Church has historically ignored grief experiences over topics that they consider sinful. When the Church rejects people’s grief in this way, we encounter “taboo grief.” This presentation explores why the Church rejects taboo grief. How do we, as a Christian, community better understand this non-traditional and often taboo grief? Is there a shame that prevents dialogue about these taboo forms of grief in our Christian communities? How might psychology help us to explore this area of grief that is often brushed under the rug by the Church? Most importantly, what can the Church do to accept all forms of grief with arms of compassion? This presentation is not a means to an answer, but rather opens the doors this area of our hearts that our society so often wants us to hide.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the historical ontological argument, original objections, modern formations, and whether or not those original objections can be shifted to apply to the modern day argument. The ontological argument is one of the great arguments of the philosophy of religion, but one that has always been a subject of debate. Although consistently sidelined because it seems to be trickery or wordplay, many major philosophers such as Descartes and Kant have discussed it and it has still not been dismissed. It has staying power, enough to last over two thousand years. The presentation is arranged in parts. It covers the original argument and objections, traces the historical path of the argument, examines a modern day modal version formulated by Alvin Plantinga, and examines whether or not the modern version is subject to the historical objections. There is a brief discussion about how the argument might be furthered, and some difficulties not addressed by Plantinga.
What can Christian viewers gain from watching film? Looking at theology and film as two areas of study, both are essential viewpoints that help audiences form ideas and observe the world around them. Because of this, theology and film intersect in a variety of ways. As part of my Religion Department senior thesis, I examined a key Christian principle of forgiveness in two popular films, and an enlightening study emerged. This comparison study and research brought to light a further understanding of our 21st century culture and important theological opportunities within this culture. Modern Christians can find significance in being open to religion and theology not only in church pews, but in the popular culture that aids in shaping society.
The life of a devout Hindu is marked by a deep sense of spirituality, a connection with the divine, and a powerful desire to see and embrace God. This is manifested in many different ways, from private offerings of food at household temples to lavish celebratory parades. All of these manifestations, however, have the same desired end result which is arguably the essence of Hinduism. Darshan is the idea of seeing and being seen by God, and is the pinnacle of Hindu worship. Through my research of Hindu folktales, ancient texts and contemporary resources, I show that darshan calls for a relationship with God which is far different from what we are conditioned to in the West. The traditional Hindu relationship with God is one of intense love, devotion and commitment, a relationship from which the Western mind may truly learn.
This project explores the link between meditative and contemplative practices and music, using Kenny Werner’s concept of Effortless Mastery which has been described as “a place inside each of us where perfection exists... All the creative possibilities of the universe are to be found there.” This three month case study of piano playing as a form of contemplation or meditation attempts to show first, how the making of music can be a genuine and rich contemplative practice, and second, how the practice of playing music contemplatively reflects the other spiritual and contemplative disciplines of the practitioner. When practicing Effortless Mastery one removes his or her own thoughts and ambitions from the performance and lets the music play itself. This study explores what is reflected in music when the musician's ego is removed from the equation and he or she simply lets the music flow.
Capital University is a private four-year undergraduate institution and graduate school located in the Columbus, Ohio, neighborhood of Bexley. Copyright © 2014 Capital University